Pick a Card Results #1

A few days ago I posted a photo of the back of a playing card (below), and challenged my incredibly devoted readers to hazard a guess as to what its color, suit, or value might be.

Okay, I admit I’m guessing about that “incredibly devoted” part, but I prefer to be optimistic.  Law of Attraction and all that.

Pick a Card 1 Back

I was frankly curious to see if:

  1. Anyone would humor Whackadoodle Woo-Woo Woman and play this funny little game at all, and
  2. Anyone would be able to pick up any information from a card in such a virtual fashion, without actually being able to see or touch it.

My theory is that intuitive information is really not limited by time or space; certain remote viewing experiments performed by the military tend to support this idea.

I envision a sort of great universal bank of information that anyone can tap into at any time, and find out what they need to know, if they really need to know it (or at least it does no one any harm).

But then again, I ate carbs yesterday, so I may not be playing with a full deck myself today.

In any case, I was pleased and surprised to find that a few people did most bravely and gallantly share their impressions, and that some did in fact give correct answers – most notably Penny, who correctly identified the value of the card as a 10, and had the initial impression of hearts for the suit.

Janice Winsor also accurately identified the suit.  You go, girls!  I’m very impressed.

Pick a Card 1 Front

I would like to try this experiment again in the near future, and I hope that even those who did not get hits this time will try again – and practice at home with your own cards or images, if the idea interests you at all. 

You can even do it while you’re watching TV, which I’m pretty sure is required by law in this country anyway.

It really is a wonderful brain-and-intuition stretching exercise, and can be deeply relaxing as well, once you get the hang of it.  You might be surprised at what you’re able to accomplish over time.

If you do try it, drop me a comment and let me know how you’re getting on!

Next time I’ll provide a few more tips on how to get impressions from objects like these, and how to tune your psychic “radio” to pick up such information.

So until then, let’s hit the deck!

Questions? Ask Your Pendulum!

While we’re on the subject of psychic card games, mystery people, and other tools for intuitive development (which we are ‘cuz I said we are), I might as well break down and confess that I have a rather serious addiction to pendulums.

Really.

Is there some sort of therapy for that?

Because I need it.

The Lovers

As is characteristic of addicts, however, I find it more comfortable to blame my problem on somebody else, and in this case the convenient scapegoat is Eva Browning of AskYourPendulum.com.

The HermitI ran across Eva’s gorgeous work by accident online (and by “accident,” I mean I was probably googling “Where can I buy way too many fabulous pendulums?”).  And the moment I saw them, I was utterly captured:  hook, line and sinker.

Or fob, chain and weight stone, as the case may be.

Eva’s pendulums (or pendies, as I like to call them), are not the typical boring-chain-glued-to-boring-pointy-crystal that you invariably run across in even the finest woo-woo establishments.  They are true works of art, each quite unique, featuring high-quality metals and carefully calibrated crystal energies intended to address specific needs.

Plus, they’re just wicked pretty.

Strength

And you can even WEAR them, for heaven’s sake.  Below is an example of one of her pendulum necklace designs, which someone should purchase for me immediately.

That would make you co-dependulant, I suppose, but I would love you unconditionally and stuff.

And this will be the last one, I promise.

Until the next one.

Inspiration

In addition to making stunning and highly useful “compasses” for the spiritual journey, Eva is just a super-warm and lovely person, and somewhere during the course of me forking over a substantial portion of my discretionary income, we got to be friends.

Go figure, right?

But there it is.

So by now I have quite the sizeable collection of these little dangling lovelies, which I display on a realistic-looking metal jewelry tree on the mantelpiece in my studio, and I am forever going in there and polishing them, moving them around, or just standing there staring at them wistfully.

And occasionally, if I really have time on my hands, I actually USE them.

If you’d like information on how to do that yourself,  Eva offers some very detailed instructions on her website, below:

http://askyourpendulum.com/How_to.asp

Now, don’t forget to leave a comment with your guesses on the first “Pick a Card” experiment.  Results will be posted in the next few days.

Identity of Mystery Person #5

As I mentioned the other day, this grainy old photo has been in my personal collection since I was a very young child.  I hauled it out recently after something I saw on television made me think of it, and I decided it was high time I actually figured out who he was.

As you can see, there’s no identifying information in the photo, and the only thing I could recall about it was that this was supposedly an astronaut who had walked on the moon, and that my father had probably taken the picture.

Mr. Groban, clearly pondering how reduced gravity might affect his acoustics

Also, according to my boyfriend, he looks a tiny little bit like the very popular singer Josh Groban, (who likely hasn’t walked on the moon, but could probably afford to purchase it by now if he wanted to).

Go for it, Josh.  You’ve earned it.

But I digress.

The detail I thought I remembered was that the person in question was the second man to walk on the moon.  But this was quickly ruled out, and the search went on.

Thanks to the everlasting wonderfulness that is Wikipedia, however, it didn’t take me too long to narrow it down, and I finally decided that this is most likely James B. Irwin, the 8th of a total of twelve moonwalkers (if you don’t include Michael Jackson), and sadly the first of that group to pass away in 1991, at the relatively tender age of 61.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Irwin

Image courtesy of NASA, who make it clear on their website that they will trap you on a rocket with a monkey if you don’t give them credit for it.  Not that there’s anything wrong with that, of course.

Jim Irwin spent nearly three days on the moon as part of the Apollo 15 mission, and was the Lunar Module pilot during the landing.  After his return, according to Wikipedia, he found himself drawn to an even higher calling than space could offer:

“Beyond his achievements as an astronaut with NASA, Irwin is known for his Christian work. He left NASA and retired from the Air Force with the rank of Colonel in 1972 and founded the High Flight Foundation, spending his last 20 years as a “Goodwill Ambassador for the Prince of Peace,” stating that “Jesus walking on the earth is more important than man walking on the moon”.[11] He frequently spoke about how his experiences in space had made the presence of God even more real to him than before.

Beginning in 1973, Irwin led several expeditions to Mount Ararat, Turkey in search of the remains of Noah’s Ark. In 1982, he was injured during the descent and had to be transported down the mountain on a horse and then to the nearest hospital by Lieutenant Orhan Baser and his commando team. Lieutenant Baser was assigned to protect and lead the team on this expedition.”

Irwin Astronauts

Oooh! In OCD-girl’s opinion, the only thing hotter than astronauts is astronauts arranged in size-descending order. So tidylicious.

Wow, never a dull moment with this guy, am I right?  And all this with a heart problem.

So it must have been in Mr. Irwin’s capacity as Goodwill Ambassador that I encountered him as a little girl.

Just out of curiosity, I got a three-month subscription on NewspaperArchive.com (which is AWESOME, by the way), and quickly found several articles documenting a special event Jim attended in 1976 in my California hometown.  He apparently made a presentation, and there was an exhibit of moon rocks and other memorabilia as well.  My father remembers that people were allowed to touch the rocks, so I guess I might have done so myself.

I have only the vaguest memory of having attended this event (so vague that it might well not be genuine), but my father does remember it, and is fairly sure my brother and I were both there.

It would be the sort of thing you might take your kids to, after all.

And now all that remains is this old photo, forlorn as footprints in the dust of the moon.

But having had it for upwards of thirty years now, I’m happy to be able to put a name to the face, in any case.  And to have such a worthy subject for our little experiments!

Speaking of which, thanks to everyone who played this time, and special kudos to my friend Élan’s husband, who not only picked up on the national and patriotic aspects of Mr. Irwin’s work, but actually guessed his first NAME!  This is most impressive, as names are very specific, and are often the most difficult details to get correct.

I also found it interesting that Élan herself commented that Jim “was making big strides and others may have taken over,” which is not only true, but her phrasing reminds me of Neil Armstrong’s famous “one giant leap for mankind” remark as he originally stepped out onto the moon.

Congratulations – that’s some mighty fine intuiting!

Check back soon, because there’s plenty more in store for the psychic space cadets among us.

You know who you are!

Mystery Person #5

Okay, this isn’t the greatest picture.

I admit it.

That’s because it’s actually a photo of a photo from my own personal collection – one that I’ve had since I was a child, so it was grainy and ancient to start with.

In fact, this man’s identity was, at least in part, still a mystery even to me until last night, when I decided to figure it out.

I didn’t do it psychically on this occasion, since I already had one or two clues based on some extremely distant memories.  But it still took me a little while to ferret out exactly who he is, and even more research to prove I was right.

But, being the stubborn type, ferret I did.

And right I was.

And I’m happy about that, because he makes a good subject for our latest little psychic experiment.  He’s quite an interesting figure, who has accomplished some remarkable things in his lifetime.

See if you can work out what they are!

Mystery Person 5

Some questions to consider:

What line of work is he in?

What is he speaking about on this occasion?

What are his personal interests?

Is he a nice person, or not so much?

What are his accomplishments?

Is he still alive?  If not, how did he die?

As always, drop me a line in the comments and let me know what your impressions are.  I’ll reveal this man’s identity in just a few days!

Identity of Mystery Person #4

Thanks to everyone who played along with our latest little psychic experiment!

The person in the photo is renowned dancer Isadora Duncan, who is widely considered to be the inventor of modern dance, and whose methods of teaching and choreography are still in use today.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isadora_Duncan

The article is well worth the read, as her life was quite unusual and influential.

She was, to put it very politely, a character.

Mystery Person 4

I intentionally chose a photo of Isadora that was rather demure and restrained-looking, because in life she wasn’t really much of either.

Below is a more typical image:

Isadora Duncan

The truth is, Isadora led a rather tragic and extravagant existence, right up until the end.

Born into a poor family, she was bereaved of her father at a fairly early age. She also lost a son and a daughter (both born out of wedlock) to a heartbreaking accident in which their car rolled into a river, drowning the children and their nanny. Isadora became pregnant again after the accident, but that child did not survive long.

She was known as a heavy drinker, a Communist, and a lesbian (not that there’s anything wrong with that), and when she died at the untimely age of 50, she did it in characteristically shocking fashion.

Isadora was nearly decapitated when one of her trademark long flowing scarves became entangled in the spokes of her motorcar as she left with a companion, dragging her from the vehicle and strangling her.

According to Wikipedia:

“Before getting into the car, she reportedly said to her friend Mary Desti and some companions, “Adieu, mes amis. Je vais à la gloire!” (Goodbye, my friends. I go to glory!). However, according to American novelist Glenway Wescott, who was in Nice at the time and visited Duncan’s body in the morgue, Desti admitted that she had lied about Duncan’s last words. Instead, she told Wescott, Duncan said, “Je vais à l’amour” (I am off to love). Desti considered this embarrassing, as it suggested that she and Falchetto were going to her hotel for a tryst.”

This was about as Isadora as it got, unfortunately, but at least she went out in a blaze of, if not exactly glory – then, uh, fashion sense?

As for her legacy, Wikipedia sums that up nicely as well (which saves me the trouble, thanks so much):

“Duncan restored dance to a high place among the arts. Breaking with convention, she traced the art of dance back to its roots as a sacred art.She developed within this idea, free and natural movements inspired by the classical Greek arts, folk dances, social dances, nature and natural forces as well as an approach to the new American athleticism which included skipping, running, jumping, leaping and tossing. With free-flowing costumes, bare feet and loose hair, Duncan restored dancing to a new vitality using the solar plexus and the torso as the generating force for all movements to follow. Her celebrated simplicity was oceanic in depth and Duncan is credited with inventing what later came to be known as modern dance.”

Yup.

What they said.

So despite being something of a card (or perhaps being short a few), Isadora managed to leave her mark on the world, where it still lingers to this day.

So how do you think you did? I chose this subject because she had led a fairly flamboyant and eventful life, but she didn’t necessarily LOOK as though she had. I wondered if people might pick up on those dramatic events despite appearances, as several of you seemed to do in the previous experiment.

You can’t always judge a book by its cover, as everyone knows, and this is definitely one of those cases.

Some readers definitely did pick up on her humble beginnings and her connection to the arts - great intuitive work there!

I’ll be posting more mystery people soon, so be sure to come back and give it another try.

After all, practice makes psychic, as they say.

Wait, what?

They don’t say that?

Well, there’s a first time for everything.

Mystery Person #4

Because several of my readers seem to be enjoying our casual psychic experiments, here’s another little intuitive cookie for you to nibble on over the weekend.

This is NOT one that I received from my boyfriend – she is a person of interest to me, and if anyone happens to recognize her, please keep it on the down-low, if you will.

As with the other Mystery People, please give some thought to this woman’s time period, character, occupation, and what she may have been notable for.

Let any impressions you may receive flow into your mind in a relaxed way without censoring them, and consider jotting them down as you go, so they don’t get away.

Then drop me a comment or an email and let me know what you got.  I can’t wait to hear about it!

Let’s have some mystery fun! 

I’ll announce her identity in just a few days, so fire away.

Mystery Person 4

Identity of Mystery Person #3

Here are the results of our most recent psychic experiment!

When my boyfriend originally sent me this photo, I had already correctly identified quite a lengthy string of people, so he informed me that this one was meant to be a “challenge” for me.

“Bring it on!” I shouted, pumping my fists Rocky-esque into the air.

Or probably not.

But you gotta admit it sounds cooler that way.

Mystery Person 3

I figured that if she was really a challenge, i.e. perhaps not quite as well known as the others, my best chance of finding her would be to work out what her name was, and as usual my synesthesia came in handy for this task.

So as soon as I opened the photo in my email, I started trying to get a sense of her colors right away.

“Is one of her names red?” I asked Chuck after looking at her for a moment or two.

“Yes, actually,” he replied, looking a bit surprised (he was kind enough to memorize my synesthetic alphabet colors shortly after meeting me, which needless to say bought him about a million-quadrillion boy-points, which are also red).

“Is it her last name, like, maybe a B?” I wanted to know.

“Yes, her last name does start with a B,” he answered, looking even more surprised.

She didn’t want to tell me much more at that moment, but as I returned to her over the next day or so, I kept getting impressions of a go-go dancer or a stripper, and the name Betty kept popping into my head.

I asked Chuck about Betty, and he confirmed that this name did have a connection to the person in the photo, as did the stripper/prostitute concept.

So I kept working.

Over dinner that night, I asked Chuck if the last name had a double letter in it.  He said that it did.

“Is the double letter an L?” I wondered out loud.

He confirmed that it was.

“I’ve been hearing the name Bell or maybe Bella for a while now,” I told him.

Looking startled again, he said “Her last name is Bell.”

Oh.  Well.

That oughtta do it.

With the clues I already had, and especially the last name, it didn’t take much more searching to figure out the identity of this young woman.

Her name is Mary Bell, and as two of my readers, Lisa and seabluelee correctly guessed (but you don’t think it was psychically – really?) she was in fact a killer.

Mary BellIn 1968, when she was 11 years old, Mary murdered and mutilated two young boys, Martin Brown and Brian Howe.  I will spare you the grisly details – unless you really want them, in which case here are two links that don’t spare much of anything:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Bell

http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/notorious_murders/famous/bell/index_1.html

Interestingly, I did not get a sense that Mary was an evil person when I was reading her aura, and I’m still not convinced that she is one. 

Her mother, whose name, not surprisingly, was Betty, was in fact a prostitute who allegedly forced Mary to engage in sexual activity with men from the age of four, and who cruelly abused the young girl in other ways as well.

It seems pretty likely that Mary is a sociopath, based on her actions and her demeanor during the case, but it’s also clear that the abuse she endured may well have been the cause of her behavior. 

Now, I’m not a big believer in the concept of evil as such, but rather in damage – and it seems obvious to me that while Mary may have been born with what I would call innate or inherent damage, she also received a great deal of applied damage from her mother, and this combination is fairly common in triggering a sociopath to take murderous action, where otherwise they might not.

In fact, Mary served twelve years in incarceration, and has apparently not offended again since that time.  She has a daughter and a granddaughter, and was granted lifelong anonymity in 2003, so it is impossible to know exactly what she’s doing these days.

But if she had killed somebody else, I daresay we would have heard about that.

Oddly enough, when I was reading her initially, I was getting something about her being a nurse (and who knows what might have been, before or long after all that damage got applied).

In reading about her afterwards, when asked what she wanted to be when she grew up, she replied that she would like to be a nurse, so that she could stick needles into people and hurt them.

Not exactly what I had in mind, but hey.

What we need here is therapy.

Lots and LOTS of therapy.

Thanks to my readers for playing along!  I was interested in Martina’s comment that she connected Mary with Sylvia Plath:  for one thing, Sylvia was an extremely disturbed person, but more intriguingly, her best-known work of literature and only novel just happens to be called The Bell Jar.

Coincidence?  Or psychic tickle?

You decide.

And drop me a comment!  I’d love to hear your thoughts!

Speaking of coincidences, in researching this person, I kept getting a strong sense of water, swimming, and youngest-person-to-do-something.  In searching for Mary Bell (once I knew her last name), I immediately ran across Marilyn Bell, who was the youngest person to swim Lake Ontario and the English Channel. 

Who knew?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marilyn_Bell

Mystery Person #3

For the more intuitively inclined (or those who would like to be), here is another Mystery Person for you to flex your mental muscles on.

Have a look at the photo below, and drop me a comment with your impressions on what sort of person she is.

Mystery Person 3

It sometimes helps to relax your eyes and look AROUND the subject of the picture, rather than directly at her.

It’s kind of like one of those old Magic Eye puzzles, you know?

If you look at it without really looking at it, then eventually you SEE it.

That’s how it works for me, anyway.

I like to read the colors of a person’s aura this way too – and the results are often surprising.  I will share some of these in stories about future Mystery People, as they come up.

I have quickly learned not to discount any information I receive, even when it doesn’t seem to fit the image in front of me.

So ask yourself something about this woman:

  • How old is she, and from what time period?
  • What is her social status?
  • Does she have a good character, a bad one, or a combination of both?
  • What did she do to become a notable individual?
  • What type of personality does she have?
  • Do you get any ideas as to her name?

Feel free to drop me a comment or an email, and let me know what your impressions are.

Don’t be shy, and don’t rule anything out!

I will reveal this person’s identity (and how I was able to locate her myself) sometime early next week.

Have a great weekend, and happy intuiting!

Identity of Mystery Person #2

Now this was a rather odd incident.  I’m still sort of mulling it over.

Thanks to Penny for playing along in the comments, and I think you’ll see that she had a couple of possible hits herself!  Good work!

I should mention that when I’m working with a photo of a person that I don’t know, I’ve noticed that my mind will often offer me an analogous individual that I DO know, by way of giving me a clue, I suppose.  I’ve been surprised at how accurate these comparisons have turned out to be, and I’ve learned to pay close attention to them.

So when I got the email from my boyfriend containing the latest mystery man (posted again here), I initially glanced at it briefly, and got the immediate analogy of Truman Capote (which turned out to be quite comparable in terms of time period, occupation, possible sexual orientation, etc).

Mystery Person 2Later, right before bed, I went back to the photo for a moment, and within about 30 seconds I got the strong impression of the name Raymond Chandler.  This idea had a sense of “ah-ha” or “rightness” that I am quickly coming to recognize.

So I looked him up, and although the sample row of images on the first page did not look EXACTLY like the man I had been sent, they were similar-looking, so I was inclined to explore a bit further.

I clicked on the image link, and sure enough, right at the top of that page was precisely the picture that Chuck had sent me.

This man looked enough like a somewhat older version of Raymond Chandler that I thought surely it WAS him, since it was mixed in with all his other photos, clearly from the same general time period, and they all had pipes or cigarettes dangling from their lips.

Quite understandably, I went to bed believing I had solved it.

But when I asked Chuck about it in the morning, he informed me that the man in the photo was not Raymond Chandler at all.

Well, I was flummoxed.  How could it not be him?  I had looked up that name, and there he was with all the other photos, looking much the same.  Even when I pulled up that image again on my iPhone, the caption read “Raymond Chandler, mystery writer.”

So what the heck was going on?

Upon further investigation, it turned out that the man Chuck had actually sent me was producer, screenwriter and director Billy Wilder, and his picture appeared in an article about Raymond Chandler because he and Chandler had collaborated on the screenplay for Double Indemnity in 1944, which turned out to be the film that really established Wilder’s career.

And that’s what he was doing in there, hobnobbing with Raymond Chandler and more or less looking like him, although apparently they didn’t even like each other that much.

Good heavens.

Could it get any Wilder?

I mean, how long do you suppose it might have taken me to work out who this guy was, without that extremely helpful clue, which led me directly to the specific photo I was looking for, right at the top of the page?

I’m not sure I’ve ever even heard of Billy Wilder, although I have heard of some of his movies, like Ninotchka, Some Like it Hot, The Seven Year Itch, and a few others.

I certainly had not the faintest idea what he looked like, however.

Obviously.

So the hit I got was not an identity, but rather a shortcut, which only goes to show how arbitrary this whole psychic thing can be, and how it can lead you in directions you wouldn’t necessarily anticipate.

Also it teaches me to double check my work, and not to make assumptions!

Because you know what they say about assuming stuff.

You know, it’s bad, or something.

More mystery people to follow – feel free to throw in your sixth sense cents!

Identity of Mystery Person #1

Wow, where did last week get off to?

Did anyone see it?

Neither did I.

I assume it’s somewhere behind the huge pile of contract work I’ve been doing, or possibly in the even larger pile of clean laundry ready to distribute to the various critters that inhabit my house, including my equally delightful boyfriend.

Yes, I think I see it.

It’s under the towels.

In any case, it seems that I have neglected to reveal the identity of the first mystery man we were working on (well, I was, anyway – I think everyone else has more sensibly been planning their turkey repasts).

I promise to do better next time, right after I wake up from my carb coma.

And in my case, since I suffer from a pretty severe sensitivity to carbs, that coma may turn out to be fairly literal.

It has really been lovely knowing you.

Mystery Person 1

Anyway, as some of you well-informed types were already aware, the person in the photo above is Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the Shah of Iran, who, according to this Wikipedia article, “ruled Iran from 16 September 1941 until his overthrow by the Iranian Revolution on 11 February 1979. He was the second and last monarch of the House of Pahlavi of the Iranian monarchy.”

For more information about the Shah, please check out the rest of the article – especially if, like my boyfriend, you are a big fan of what I call wikiwandering – the practice of jumping randomly from one Wikipedia link to another until you have lost all sense of time and reality.

And if you’re not, you should give it a try.

Because who needs reality?

I certainly don’t.

Now, while I was not able to positively identify the Shah on this first go-round, it was clear to me from the photo that he was a dictatorial leader of a middle-eastern country under Western influence, that he had a rather despotic and controlling nature, and might have been responsible for the death or torture of a number of people – all of which proved to be true.

Did you pick up on these traits as well?  Or anything else?  Drop me a comment and let me know.

In this first experiment, I tried a technique that proved to be useful, and which I have since used several times with good results – I ask the subject of the photo a question.

“What are you all about?” is the general gist of the inquiry.  They almost always have something to say in reply, and although it sometimes surprises me, it’s quite often revealing in some important respect.

“I like to conquer and destroy,” was the Shah’s reply.

And from what I can tell, I suspect that he did.

And now, for someone completely different:

Mystery Person 2In selecting our next mystery person, I’m going to jump well out of sequence to the case I was given just yesterday, because the way that his identity came to me was quite unusual, and I feel like sharing.

I will tell you all about it in the next day or so (promise – coma or no coma), but if you’d like to play along, here is his photo:

If this person interests you, feel free to shoot me a comment or an email, and tell me what you think of him.

What does he do for a living?  What sort of a character does he have?  What time period does he belong to?  What is his name?

And most importantly, of course:  What is the deal with that overcoat? 

I mean really.

I would of course be thrilled if my readers would like to participate (yes, I mean both of you!), but if not, I’ll report on the hits that I got on each person, and how I was able to identify them, because it’s been quite a fascinating intuitive journey thus far.

And I do love a good mystery!

Don’t you?